| Feature | FSX + BTS RV-7 | Real RV-7 / RV-7A | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | | Better ($150) | Worse ($80k+) | | Convenience | Better (fly anytime) | Worse (weather, maintenance) | | Realism | Good (85%) | Perfect (100%) | | Risk | Better (none) | Worse (life & limb) | | Satisfaction | Low | Better (indescribable) | The Ultimate Recommendation: The Hybrid Approach Stop asking "which is better" and start asking "which is better for me right now ?"
You are the maintenance officer. Unless you pay a mechanic (A&P), you will spend weekends on condition inspections, changing spark plugs, cleaning belly oil, and chasing elusive electrical gremlins. If you built the plane yourself (as most RV owners do), you know every screw. That is a blessing and a curse. A "better" day for a real RV owner is a day where nothing breaks and you actually get to fly. fsx bts vans rv 7 7a better
Real RV-7/7A (unanimous). The "better" experience here is human, not technical. The Verdict: So, Which is Actually "Better"? You cannot declare an absolute winner because the keyword asks for better without context. Here is the final breakdown: | Feature | FSX + BTS RV-7 |