In the pantheon of late 20th-century art criticism, few names loom as large—or provoke as much rigorous debate—as Rosalind Krauss. A co-founder of the seminal journal October , Krauss has spent decades dismantling the formalist orthodoxies of Clement Greenberg while simultaneously carving a distinct path through post-structuralism, psychoanalysis, and the philosophy of medium specificity. For students, scholars, and artists grappling with the transition from modernism to postmodernism, one essay stands as a crucial, albeit notoriously dense, milestone: “Reinventing the Medium” (1999).
For academic citation: Krauss, Rosalind. “Reinventing the Medium.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 25, no. 2, 1999, pp. 289–312. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1344239. rosalind krauss reinventing the medium pdf
The essay originally appeared in the peer-reviewed journal Critical Inquiry (Vol. 25, No. 2, Winter 1999, pp. 289-312). It was later reprinted in Krauss’s essential collection, Perpetual Inventory (MIT Press, 2010). In the pantheon of late 20th-century art criticism,
Krauss’s great gift was to show that art is not about freedom from constraints, but about the rigorous exploration of constraints. To reinvent the medium is to find the rule—and then break it beautifully. Whether on a video monitor, a charcoal drawing, or a computer screen, that recursive loop is where meaning lives. For academic citation: Krauss, Rosalind
Under Clement Greenberg’s modernism, the “medium” was defined by its physical limits. Painting was flatness and pigment; sculpture was volume and gravity. The goal of modernist art was to purify the medium, stripping away anything that belonged to another art form (literature, theater, architecture). By the 1970s, however, this logic had exhausted itself. Minimalism and Conceptualism attacked the very idea of artistic purity, leading many critics to declare the death of the medium.